logo

800.626.0054

 
     
  • Home
  • About Interface
    • Overview
    • News and Press Releases
    • Case Studies
    • Interface Articles
    • Employment Opportunities
  • Expert Services
    • Construction Claims & Disputes
      • Construction Delay Claims
      • Labor Productivity Claims
      • Design and Construction Defect Claims
      • Force Majeure Claims
      • Acceleration Claims
      • Suspension and Termination Claims
      • Differing Site Conditions Claims
      • Change Claims
    • Construction Defects
    • CPM Schedule Analysis
      • Windows Analysis or Contemporaneous Period Analysis
      • Time Impact Analysis (TIA)
      • Collapsed As-Built
      • Impacted As-Planned
      • As-Planned vs. As-Built
    • Construction Management
      • Contract Administration
      • Implementation of Project Controls
      • Execution of Processes and Procedures
      • Change Management
      • Risk Management
    • Litigation & Arbitration
      • Prudence Evaluation Experts
      • International Arbitration Construction Experts
      • Labor Productivity Analysis Experts
      • Schedule Delay Experts
      • Damage Quantification Experts
      • Design & Construction Defects Experts
      • Acceleration Experts
      • Suspension & Termination Experts
      • Force Majeure Experts
      • Differing Site Conditions Experts
      • Construction Change Experts
    • Project Advisory
      • Construction Readiness Assessment
      • Contracting Strategy Development
      • Cost Risk Assessment
      • Project Audit
      • Project Execution Planning
      • Project Framing
  • Industries Served
    • Buildings & Facilities
      • Buildings
        • Education
        • Government Buildings
        • Commercial Buildings
        • Retail
      • Healthcare
      • Entertainment, Sports & Convention Centers
      • Industrial & Manufacturing
      • Multifamily Housing & Hotels
        • Multifamily Housing
        • Hotels
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
      • Airports
      • Heavy Civil
      • Roads, Highways, Bridges & Rail
      • Utilities
      • Water & Wastewater Treatment
    • Oil & Gas Pipelines
      • Land Pipelines
      • Subsea Pipelines
    • Marine & Offshore Production
      • Offshore
      • Ports, Piers & Wharfs
      • Shipbuilding & Vessels
    • Power & Energy
    • Chemical & Petrochemical
    • LNG & NGL
    • Oil & Gas Processing
    • Refining
  • Interface Experts
    • Frank G. Adams, PE
    • Cody L. Crawford
    • Jacob P. Hammond
    • Lisa Sumner Heard
    • Thomas M. Hetzel
    • Dennis R. Jasinski, Fellow – ICCP
    • Angela E. Lopez
    • Karen P. Matthews
    • P. Dane Price, PMP
    • Matthew S. Scheps, PE, PMP
    • Christopher J. Sullivan
    • Philip D. Barnard, PE, CCP
    • Greg Lamberson
    • Pete D. Luan, PMP
    • Carolyn L. Morgan, CPA
    • Erick Schirmer
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login
  • Home
  • About Interface
    • Overview
    • News and Press Releases
    • Case Studies
    • Interface Articles
    • Employment Opportunities
  • Expert Services
    • Construction Claims & Disputes
      • Construction Delay Claims
      • Labor Productivity Claims
      • Design and Construction Defect Claims
      • Force Majeure Claims
      • Acceleration Claims
      • Suspension and Termination Claims
      • Differing Site Conditions Claims
      • Change Claims
    • Construction Defects
    • CPM Schedule Analysis
      • Windows Analysis or Contemporaneous Period Analysis
      • Time Impact Analysis (TIA)
      • Collapsed As-Built
      • Impacted As-Planned
      • As-Planned vs. As-Built
    • Construction Management
      • Contract Administration
      • Implementation of Project Controls
      • Execution of Processes and Procedures
      • Change Management
      • Risk Management
    • Litigation & Arbitration
      • Prudence Evaluation Experts
      • International Arbitration Construction Experts
      • Labor Productivity Analysis Experts
      • Schedule Delay Experts
      • Damage Quantification Experts
      • Design & Construction Defects Experts
      • Acceleration Experts
      • Suspension & Termination Experts
      • Force Majeure Experts
      • Differing Site Conditions Experts
      • Construction Change Experts
    • Project Advisory
      • Construction Readiness Assessment
      • Contracting Strategy Development
      • Cost Risk Assessment
      • Project Audit
      • Project Execution Planning
      • Project Framing
  • Industries Served
    • Buildings & Facilities
      • Buildings
        • Education
        • Government Buildings
        • Commercial Buildings
        • Retail
      • Healthcare
      • Entertainment, Sports & Convention Centers
      • Industrial & Manufacturing
      • Multifamily Housing & Hotels
        • Multifamily Housing
        • Hotels
    • Transportation & Infrastructure
      • Airports
      • Heavy Civil
      • Roads, Highways, Bridges & Rail
      • Utilities
      • Water & Wastewater Treatment
    • Oil & Gas Pipelines
      • Land Pipelines
      • Subsea Pipelines
    • Marine & Offshore Production
      • Offshore
      • Ports, Piers & Wharfs
      • Shipbuilding & Vessels
    • Power & Energy
    • Chemical & Petrochemical
    • LNG & NGL
    • Oil & Gas Processing
    • Refining
  • Interface Experts
    • Frank G. Adams, PE
    • Cody L. Crawford
    • Jacob P. Hammond
    • Lisa Sumner Heard
    • Thomas M. Hetzel
    • Dennis R. Jasinski, Fellow – ICCP
    • Angela E. Lopez
    • Karen P. Matthews
    • P. Dane Price, PMP
    • Matthew S. Scheps, PE, PMP
    • Christopher J. Sullivan
    • Philip D. Barnard, PE, CCP
    • Greg Lamberson
    • Pete D. Luan, PMP
    • Carolyn L. Morgan, CPA
    • Erick Schirmer
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Tracking Performance = Tracking Profitability

by Jacob Hammond
Construction ClaimsOctober 7, 20220 comments

Mentioning tracking performance on a construction site may elicit eye rolling, while mentioning tracking profitability may elicit interest. However, they are correlated. It is essential for contractors to track labor and equipment performance (estimated vs. actual unit cost, and estimated vs. actual productivity) on construction projects for two reasons:

  1. Measuring performance trends on current projects
  2. Developing accurate historical unit cost and productivity for future estimating purposes

Tracking performance ensures accountability while providing data for accurately estimating future bids. As management expert Peter Drucker once said, “What gets measured gets improved.” The lack of resources to verify, track, input, and analyze the data can prevent contractors from improving their competitiveness and profitability. Tracking performance becomes even more important when it is used to resolve problems (e.g., delays, disruptions, periods of inefficiency, and cost overruns), pending issues from the onset of work, or disputes.

Contractors should embrace the notion that work activities can and should be tracked and compared against the estimate. Many contractors continue to resist tracking performance despite an array of available technology. Often, even though there may be no debate about the merits of performance tracking, it is difficult to change the contractor’s established construction estimating, accounting, and operations processes, which is required to facilitate timely and accurate performance tracking.

Here is how to track performance:

  • Adopt a tracking system that works in the office and the field.
    • The project management team must adopt a useful system from the beginning of the project. The system must integrate and align with the project estimate as well as monitor labor and equipment hours against installed quantities consistent with the way the project was estimated.
    • The system should be able to track the location of work by area within the project. This refined tracking can identify productivity improvements or degradation of labor hours by discrete areas that can then be compared against each other.
    • The system should relate to schedule activities. The activities can incorporate the hours and quantities from the tracking system and provide verifiable, quicker, and more accurate assessments of project cost and schedule status.
  • Designate a performance tracker. Generally, job foremen are accountable for recording production data in the field since they are most familiar with the crews. Daily data collection and input is best, as it can provide immediate identification of problematic conditions. The daily tracking of actual hours against installed quantities can be used for upcoming daily planning and schedule updates.

The performance-tracking metrics are used to compare estimated and actual productivity for relevant pay items. This generates timely feedback on the daily productivity of fieldwork, which can be compared against the project estimate to evaluate performance and profitability. The benefit of tracking labor productivity is the instantaneous knowledge of crews’ performance against the bid performance rates. Armed with this knowledge, the project manager can then:

  • Make immediate adjustments to processes or field labor if productivity or schedule expectations are not being met; or
  • Issue a notice of a changed conditions if conditions are beyond the contractor’s control.

It is imperative to segregate extra work and non-conforming re-work activities into discrete work scopes (e.g., pending change orders, claims, and contentious issues that may result in claims), because a contractor typically acknowledges through a change order that the change is a complete settlement of certain added work, or work it did not anticipate for which it is entitled to additional compensation and/or time. Daily tracking the location of work being performed can further document and establish disrupted work conditions (if needed) in a changed conditions request.

Tracking performance is not just possible – it can be essential for ensuring profitable work on current and future projects.

Click here to view the full article.


Dennis R. Jasinski is a principal consultant at Interface Consulting in Houston, Texas. For more information, contact Mr. Jasinski at drjasinski@Interface-Consulting.com or 713-626-2525.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, position, or policy of Interface Consulting or its other employees and affiliates.

Tackling DelaysPrev
The Sandbagging TrapNext

Categories

CONTACT US

To find out how our Construction Consultants and Experts can assist you, or for other inquiries, please call 800.626.0054 or

EMAIL US NOW

The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of Interface Consulting, its management, or its other professionals.

logo

Interface Consulting International, Inc., is a leading construction consulting firm providing a portfolio of professional support services to a wide range of clients including owners, contractors, attorneys, engineers, insurers, and suppliers involved in the engineering and construction process.

Quick Links

  • About Interface
  • Industries Served
  • News & Press Releases
  • Interface Articles
  • Interface Experts
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Client Login

Expert Services

  • Construction Claims & Disputes
  • Construction Defects
  • Construction Management
  • CPM Schedule Analysis
  • Litigation & Arbitration
  • Project Advisory

Corporate Office

  • Interface Consulting International, Inc.
  • 5847 San Felipe Street, Suite 1910
  • Houston, TX 77057
  • contact@interface-consulting.com
  • 800.626.0054(Phone)
  • 713.626.2555 (Fax)
  • Get Directions
     
  • Interface Consulting
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site built with Port City Media.